Objectives of the course, to whom it is assigned and what are the prerequisites to take it. Objectives, Target Audience and Prerequisites. Definition and origin of Selenium.
Arguments to adopt Selenium as the main tool for web application testing automation. Why Use Selenium? The main steps that make up the process to test the software. Stages of the Software Testing Process. Process of Automation of Functional Tests. About the structure of the IDE and its main features. Step-by-step how to build the scripts through the IDE's "recorder" function. Preparing the Test Scripts Record. Step by step how to run the scripts through the IDE. Running the Test Scripts Play. Step by step how to save the Selenium IDE scripts correctly. Saving Test Scripts.
Step by step how to export the test scripts in the format appropriate to the test project. Exporting Test Scripts. A little bit about the origin of the API and how it works in practice. About API. Creating the Test Project. Import libraries and resources needed to build the project successfully. Configuring the Test Project. Simplified way to add the exported scripts to the test project. Importing Exported Scripts.
Adjusting the Imported Scripts. Running the tests by Eclipse. Running Eclipse Testing. Visualization of test execution reports provided by TestNG. Generating Test Execution Reports. Discount Coupons for paid courses in Portuguese. I dunno why.
It just feels better. I'll try the Ruby driver again. Another wonderful post! Selenium and BrowserStack are truly great tools. Together they are a fantastic solution to automatically test web sites and applications. I've been a long time "lurker" and wanted to comment on this post just to say thanks. Mike A. If you are serious about cross-browser web application testing, you should take a closer look at Silk Test from Borland happens to be the company, I am working for.
But seriously, if you are into testing advanced workflows samples like Google search are always easy and want easy-maintenance, stables scripts you will love Silk Test. Also, you can have your test scripts in C or VB. Just approach me if you need more info on Silk Test. Wolfgang Ziegler. I just started using Watir a few weeks ago.
Work was rather slow, so I decided to make myself useful by exploring some automated testing. We just had an issue where order totals were not being calculated correctly. I just wish it had the ability to read HTTP status codes. I'm a big fan of BrowserStack too but you might as well forget it for testing internal Windows Authenticated sites.
I was recently told that his was addressed but when testing on all of the browser types Chrome, IE, Safari they all appear to have trouble with the NTLM handshake. Sometimes it appears to work but then I'm prompted for every single request after the initial success. Figured I'd post this in case anyone were to purchase or get the trial.
Justin Michaels. Instead of the main page, click on the Sign In link or the Sign Up link at the top of the main browserstack site to be taken to SSL encrypted pages. Brian M. If you want to write your browser tests in C , I highly recommend FluentAutomation. Check out their Getting Started docs. I've used it in one of my projects and I was able to get it working faster than Selenium alone. Another cool thing with BrowserStack is that if you have an internal website or programmatically start IIS Express during your tests, you can run their BrowserStackTunnel.
It's a great way to run smoke tests on your build server before deploying to a public location.
Steven Kuhn. It can export the recorded steps into your favorite language C , Python, ect. Kurt Wiersma. Has the BrowserStack 3 month offer ended? It is still displayed proudly on the Modern. Ie site, but says: "You can redeem your offer anytime before January 10, ". Great post!! Will consider browser stack for my next project as testing tool. Jalpesh Vadgama. We were really looking forward to getting our hands dirty with BrowserStack.
This has put the pricing out of what is acceptable for us and also we would break the FUP every single day. Shame, I loved it when I used the free trial. Stephen Kuhn I agree, FluentAutomation is very easy to use. It also gives you the option of using PhantomJS so you can run "headless" tests.
I'm not sure how it copes with automatic testing as I have been using Karma formerly known as Testacular which is blazing fast but if you are working on a full. NET project FluentAutomation seems to fit nicely.
Matthew Blott. Glad to see some people bring up FluentAutomation - we've got a nice community forming these days. There is a lot of movement in the hosted cloud testing area right now from Selenium Grid deployments SauceLabs to fully custom solutions. We're building F14N with the goal of tackling the overall issue of automated testing test creation, maintainability, execution, etc.
Brandon Stirnaman. I agree with Matthew Blott - PhantomJS is nice alternative as it's faster and less prone to accidental errors. I too however used it only for JavaScript unit testing with Karma test runner. This works really well. We are currently using Jasmine on our own server for acceptance test and it's very unstable.
- .
- .
- sadlers indoor racing online coupons!
- strictly sail inc coupon!
For example Firefox update dialog can "brake" test. For legal reasons we cannot use something like BrowserStack. Looks like I might have to try out browser stack in future projects. Awesome to see it in Python. Thomas Henson. If test automation is not a priority, then there is a nice www.